One Beach of a deal

By SUE-ANN LEVY, City Hall Columnist

Last Updated: May 23, 2010 9:47am

We couldn’t have picked a better day last Wednesday when my wife Denise and I decided to do lunch at the Boardwalk Cafe — the Beaches institution that has been the subject of tremendous controversy over a 20-year deal now being inked with City Hall.Click here to watch the video
We couldn’t have picked a better day last Wednesday when my wife Denise and I decided to do lunch at the Boardwalk Cafe — the Beaches institution that has been the subject of tremendous controversy over a 20-year deal now being inked with City Hall.
Play Video

We couldn’t have picked a better day last Wednesday when my wife Denise and I decided to do lunch at the Boardwalk Cafe — the Beaches institution that has been the subject of tremendous controversy over a 20-year deal now being inked with City Hall.

The panorama of Lake Ontario, the Eastern Beaches and Woodbine Park — from our prime seat on the restaurant’s patio — was spectacular.

I wish I could say the same for the pub itself.

The patio was chock full of as many weeds as customers. Our picnic-style metal seats and table, the kind McDonald’s used in the 1970s, were situated near a wood railing that looked like it was about to crumble any minute.

The entire restaurant — seedy and dirty — was in desperate need of a paint job. In the ladies washroom, we found feces on the floor of one of the stalls.

In the front we noticed loose electrical wiring popping up from a pipe, broken windows and a pair of dirty socks lying near the front door.

It appeared that a building inspector hadn’t been near the place in ages.

On the patio, most people were drinking rather than eating lunch.

Small wonder Denise and I didn’t enjoy our meal at all.

My $15 salad was bland and soaked in dressing that tasted like mayonnaise. Denise’s $17 pad Thai dish — allegedly one of the house specialities — was drowning in oil.

Our lunch — including two Diet Cokes — came to $46.82 with tax and tip.

It made the slice of pizza from the Pizza Pizza kiosk that operates out of the side of the cafe look good.

n n n

This restaurant and the prime beachfront property surrounding it is the food and beverage domain of Tuggs Inc., owned by George Foulidis — the man some critics call the King of the Eastern Beaches.

It was exactly 24 years ago today that the city first signed an agreement with Foulidis, giving him the exclusive right to sell food and beverages at the Boardwalk Cafe in Woodbine Beach park and at two seasonal concessions in the Eastern Beaches — D.D. Summerville Pool and Kew Gardens.

In exchange he spent $2.7 million building the restaurant and related concessions.

After two renewals, his lease was set to expire in September 2007.

When he came forward with an unsolicited proposal in August 2006 asking for another 20 years on his lease, city officials proposed going to a request for proposals to solicit the kind of competitive bids that would ensure a fair and transparent process.

But council, led by the ward Councillor Sandra Bussin, overruled the staff recommendations and parks officials were directed in February 2007 to negotiate a sole-source deal with Foulidis.

They came back suddenly late last month indicating that after three years of negotiation the only deal they were able to work out would see Foulidis paying $1 million less in rent — some $4.75 million compared to the $5.75 million proposed by him in April 2007 — and only $340,000 in sponsorship revenue compared to the $750,000 he’d offered in his original proposal. This would occur over the 20-year term of the lease, which is to end in 2028.

For this, he would get exclusive rights to sell liquor in Ashbridge’s Bay in addition to Woodbine Park, as well as a monopoly on beverage and food sales at Kew Beach, nearby Balmy Beach and D.D. Summerville pool.

But there’s more.

In this new deal, he’ll also be allowed to sell souvenirs and other non-food items in the entire Eastern Beaches and bring in mobile vending trucks selling ice cream treats whenever he so chooses.

Doug McDonald, manager of business services with parks and recreation, said one of the reasons the negotiations have been so protracted is because Foulidis wanted to have “ownership of everything that happened” in the Eastern Beaches.

He insists Foulidis will have to run his sponsorship ideas by city officials and that there won’t be beer or cigarette advertising on those parklands.

“We don’t want him to have final say in everything that goes on in the public realm,” McDonald said, noting the final deal will likely be signed in the next two weeks.

But Beaches resident Chris Yaccato, who’s led a citizens’ group against the deal, says it puts Foulidis in control of everything that happens for about a 5-km stretch of the Eastern Beach — even to the point of dictating whether fundraising groups have to use his services.

He, like many other Beaches residents, can’t understand how the mayor and city officials — who continually talk a good game about making the waterfront clean and beautiful — can turn such prime parkland over carte blanche to someone whom he feels is simply in it to make money.

“This is prime real estate,” he says. “It is such a missed opportunity.”

Keith Begley, another Beaches resident, is upset that this new deal will allow Foulidis to set up souvenir shacks on the Beaches.

“It’s going to look like Coney Island,” he said. “He’s had huge preferential treatment and no one in the Beaches has had any say.”

n n n

When first approached at his restaurant last Wednesday, Foulidis flatly refused to comment, saying he’d been advised by his lawyer not to talk.

A collection of hangers-on glared as we took photos and followed us as we continued along the boardwalk to tour some of the other concessions — including a vending truck operated by a man named Gus.

When Foulidis finally agreed to chat and we returned to the restaurant, a man identifying himself as Nick endeavoured to run interference before we were finally shown to a table.

Foulidis argues that he’s been “wrongfully accused” by those trying to turn his deal into a “political football” and insists he’s done nothing “untoward.”

He says that the statements about him paying $1 million less over the 20-year term have been blown “out of context” — that the city will be getting more money from a “new sponsorship model” that didn’t previously exist to them.

His said his plan is to assign a team of employees to find big corporate sponsors like Molson to back events on the Beaches (sponsors that would then give him and the city a cut of the action).

Foulidis also contends that all this talk about his “monopoly” is “hogwash” and that already this year, he’s waived his exclusive rights to sell food and beverages for a half-dozen events.

“I don’t have a monopoly,” he contends. “The city doesn’t want two restaurants here.”

As for the decrepit state of his restaurant, he says he didn’t want to fix up the place until the lease is signed. But once it is, he says he will be spending $2.1 million refurbishing and expanding the restaurant and fixing up the concessions at D.D. Summerville pool and Kew Gardens (where a patio will also be installed).

n n n

Sandra Bussin was in her element at her Victory in 2010 Campaign Party at trendy Sauvignon restaurant last Tuesday night.

The wine and fancy hors d’oeuvres were flowing, a string ensemble provided the background music and her inner circle of leftist pals were all there to fete her.

Councillors Paula Fletcher, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Anthony Perruzza, Joe Pantalone, Howard Moscoe, Adam Giambrone and Maria Augimeri rubbed shoulders with the likes of MPPs Peter Tabuns and Michael Prue.

Across the street, a handful of protesters brandished signs that read: “It’s Our Park. It’s Not for Sale” — among other slogans.

Leroy St. Germaine — the Beaches senior who’s the subject of a taxpayer-funded lawsuit by Bussin for daring to criticize her in his Ward 31 and 32 newsletters — said he has no doubt the Tuggs deal should be revisited and put to a vote by all of council.

Bussin was conspicuously absent from the May 12 council meeting — as were 16 other councillors and the mayor — when the controversial Tuggs Inc. contract finally came up for discussion at 7:55 p.m., narrowly passing 15-13.

She was, however, in the council chamber and voted to pursue the Tuggs Inc. unsolicited proposal in September 2006. That time, it passed 24-8.

Despite numerous efforts to reach her before press time, Bussin repeatedly refused requests for an interview.

She did leave a voicemail indicating that she “chose not to participate” in the council meeting that night because of the “shenanigans” that were going on in her ward around this issue.

She also contended that one of her concerns — when she first promoted the deal with Foulidis in 2006 — was that the Docks was “very interested” in the site and would in “all likelihood outbid” the “family business” operated by Tuggs.

Nevertheless at council May 12, it was left to Bussin’s pal Fletcher to lead the charge. As her voice grew more outraged by the moment, Fletcher insisted there was “nothing untoward” with the deal and that the “spurious things” being said about it (and the councillor involved) are “disgusting.”

n n n

Former Toronto cop and licensed private investigator Bert O’Mara of Mosaic Investigations was hired by a client in the ward in 2007 to look into Sandra Bussin’s 2006 election contributions.

His detailed 147-page report shows the councillor who paints herself as “unstoppable” received a total of $8,250 (representing 18% of her total 2006 donations) from what were then friends, family members, officers of Foulidis’ company and his employees.

“The document speaks for itself,” O’Mara said late last week.

When contacted about the report, Bussin left a second message blaming St. Germaine, indicating he’s a “Fagin-type character” who’s being financed by some developers in the ward to “discredit” her.

“I will not discuss this any further … I am suing this individual and it is in the courts.”

At first Foulidis called the allegations a “witchhunt” and threatened “serious consequences” to those he says are slandering his business.

When pressed, he said that perhaps certain members of his family and friends contributed to Bussin’s campaign in 2006 and if they did, he’s “proud” that they did.

He added that he’s so angry about the allegations, he plans to “encourage” his friends and family to contribute to Bussin’s campaign again this year.

“If she’s willing to accept them, I’m proud of it,” Foulidis said. “She’s done a good job … she has integrity.”

Yaccato feels quite differently.

“I see this deal as poor for the city and poor for taxpayers,” he said. “There should be a full public audit.”


3 thoughts on “One Beach of a deal

  1. votejohnrichardson Post author

    On June 9, 2010 Toronto City Council demonstrated its contempt for the taxpayers of Toronto by refusing to reopen the issue of awarding this contract without tender.

    “Natalie Alcoba, National Post · Thursday, Jun. 10, 2010

    A controversial contract to award one long-time restaurateur exclusive rights to sell drinks and food along a large swath of the Beach stands. Community outrage, and renewed interest among councillors who had voted in favour of the contract last month, without going to tender, fell flat yesterday, as council voted 22-to-19 not to revisit the matter. At issue is an extension to 2028 of a contract held by George Foulidis, head of Tuggs Inc., who runs the Boardwalk Pub in Woodbine Beach Park, and concession stands at Kew Beach and D.D. Summerville pool. His territory now also includes Ashbridges Bay. His family has operated the business since 1986 and in 2007, after local councillor Sandra Bussin argued in favour of preserving good business relationships, council voted not to go to public tender. It took staff and Mr. Foulidis 36 months to negot a lease, which at $4.7-million was $1-million less than originally proposed.”

    Read more:

  2. votejohnrichardson Post author

    Beach residents question Tuggs food contract

    Natalie Alcoba, National Post · Tuesday, Jun. 1, 2010

    There are growing calls for the city to take another look at a controversial decision to award a single Beach restaurateur potentially lucrative rights to sell along a stretch of the waterfront, without a public tender.

    Residents in the area who have spoken out against the deal upped the ante yesterday, issuing a public letter that called on the auditor general to investigate how the sole source agreement came about.

    Last month, City Council signed off on a deal that grants Tuggs Inc. exclusive rights to sell food and drinks along much of the beaches until 2028. Under the new terms, George Foulidis, the head of Tuggs and proprietor of the Boardwalk Pub in Woodbine Beach Park, grew his territory to also include the popular Ashbridges Bay, where only he can sell liquor, plus snacks from a vending truck, and souvenir and beach paraphernalia. He also operates concession stands at Kew Beach and D.D. Summerville pool.

    The new contract, with a $4.7-million rent that is $1-million less than staff had been aiming for, is a result of 36 months of negotiations between the city and Mr. Foulidis, after council voted in 2007 not to take the contract to public tender. Back then, staff advised that the best way to ensure the city is getting a good deal is to open it up to competitive bidding. But local councillor Sandra Bussin (Beaches East York) argued that the city had found a “good fit” in the family-owned business that has been operating on the beach since 1986, and should focus on “retaining good relationships.”

    This time around, staff said that the new deal, in spite of falling short in certain areas, was the best they could do.

    But a group of local residents say that is not good enough. A petition with 80 signatures is asking City Council to rescind its Tuggs decision, consult with the public, issue a request for proposal and allow for public input before signing off on a new deal.

    Councillor Frances Nunziata, who regrets voting in favour of the deal in May, believes the contract needs to go for an RFP and will move a motion at a City Council meeting next week asking that the matter be reopened. She needs two-thirds support to pass a motion.

    In an open letter, the group led by residents Chris Yaccato and Bruce Baker write they are “concerned that awarding this lease without community participation and a [request for proposals] is wrong.”

    Mr. Yaccato further states that “in no way do I feel anything Tuggs, itself, has done anything improper but rather the process in which the lease was awarded by the City of Toronto appears to be seriously flawed.” He said only a full audit would “restore public trust” in the procurement policy. Mr. Foulidis did not return repeated calls for comment.

    Meanwhile, Councillor Doug Holyday has asked the integrity commissioner to study the matter. He does not think it was appropriate for Ms. Bussin to take a position on the issue back in 2007.

    “She interfered with a staff recommendation that had to do with city policy and I think we have to be fair to one and all. If a councillor happens to know the people in the operation isn’t a good enough reason to step in,” he said. Ms. Bussin, who did not vote on the matter in May, did not return a call to her office for comment.

    The vote on May 12 passed on a 15-12 vote, with 17 members absent.

    Read more:

  3. Pingback: Toronto City Council demonstrates contempt for taxpayers « Vote John Richardson – Independent Judgment For Toronto Danforth – Ward 29!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s